A
Response to Entertainment Weekly's Review of Princess
Mononoke
Editorial
by Anicore
August 31, 1999
I
was very disappointed with your magazine's review of
Princess Mononoke in the fall preview issue. Never in
my life have I read a more disgusting example of misrepresentation.
Calling this film a "decapitation and death-festooned
fable" is a blatant lie. This film has more substance,
soul & artistic merit than most of the recent films
I've seen come out of the Hollywood industry put together.
With such a complex story line and beautiful animation,
if magazines like yours gave this film even half the
credit due, it could easily fall in line with films
like Braveheart & Saving Private Ryan. It is certainly
this year's best film, recognized or not. I strongly
suggest that in the future your reviewers take the time
to fully absorb what animated films have to offer; rather
than at the first sight of blood just chalk it up as
another mindless "adults only" cartoon whose
soul purpose is to test the limits of the ratings bureau.
This comparison to South Park is just unforgivable.
After all, I didn't notice you compare Saving Private
Ryan to Rambo.
The
only function your review serves is to further imprint
on the American mind the absurd stereotype that all
animated films should be aimed at families and children,
regardless of story and content value. Yes, this film
does contain scenes of extreme violence. However, it
is also shows the audience the horrors of war and the
consequences of selfish thought; while at the same time
removing the element of "good vs. evil, "
in favor of the true to life "opposite sides of
the same ideal." Hopefully this injustice will
not have too derogatory an affect on further import
animated films being given a chance in US theaters.
Note
from Chris: the letter was mailed on August 31,
1999, and no response was ever written.